Public Health for Chains of Organizational Structure-myassignmenthelp

Question: Discuss about thePublic Health for Chains of Organizational Structure. Answer: Introduction In the modern day business, it has become crucial for the companies to make sure that they have an organisational structure that suits their operations (Chaudoir, Dugan Barr, 2013). This helps an organisation irrespective of the industry to bring smoothness in the work process. It is the role of the management to make sure that the organisational structure they have incorporated adds value to their operations. In the health care unit organisational structure plays a more vital role in the decision making process. This is due to the fact that there are many decisions that have to be made by the workers at an instant. Every company makes its mission, vision and objectives. The organisational structure helps the company in working according to this structure. Whitlam Memorial Hospital is a 30 bed community hospital in Sydney. It is necessary for the company of this scale to make changes in the organisational structure as per the requirement of the firm. This will help the company in so lving the problems related with it. This essay highlights the strength and weaknesses of current organisational structure at WMH. It also describes the importance of organisational mission, vision and objectives as well as the link between them and organisational structure. It also suggests about the organisational structure which best suits them. Strength and weakness of current functional structure Every organisational structure has its own strengths and weakness (Luxford, Safran Delbanco, 2011). The success of organisational structure depends on the way a company has implemented it as well as the requirements it has. Presently the company has a traditional bureaucratic structure. This is a hierarchical structure that helps in having control over the sub-ordinate levels. This is top to bottom approach where each level has its own responsibilities. Following such organisational structure, WHM gives power to the managers to make decisions. It depends on his or her style of management that whether they would take the consent of their junior level workers or not. This structure has many types of benefits. This organisational structure enforces a predefined rigid rules as well as standard procedures and processes are being followed (Harper, 2015). This type of structure helps the large organisation like WMH to have more administrative control over its operations. This also helps an organisation in terms of the fact that it fastens the speed of strategic decision making. This type of organisational structure helps WMH in reducing the problem due to conflict of interest. On the other hand this organisational structure has some limitations. The first and foremost limitation of this organisational structure is that it enhances the chances of employee being unsatisfied with the decision making. This also demotivates innovation and creativity within the organisation. This is based on the fact that a single person cannot generate as varied ideas especially when it is related to inter-disciplinary domains (Kohl 3rd, et al., 2012). It can enhance emplo yee turnover rates since the frontline employee may not feel themselves to be important as the upper level staffs. Such rigidness in the rules and regulations reduces the chances that employee can adjust into the changing market conditions. This type of organisational structure is not good for the health organisations where immediate decisions have to be made by the staffs as primary levels of operations (Ashkenas, Ulrich, Jick Kerr, 2015). Importance of organisational vision, mission and objectives In any organisation vision, mission and objectives plays a very significant role (Dahlgaard, Pettersen Dahlgaard-Park, 2011). Mission and vision helps a company in binding the overall function of an organisation in one unit. It is to be made sure that health care centres have a large number of people that comes from different social backgrounds. Mission and Vision statements help in uniting all of them in one knot. This is necessary for achieving the strategies of the organisation. The mission and vision of the firm helps in communicating the purpose of the organisation to the stakeholders and also informs about the strategy development of the company. Both mission and vision explains about the idea of the organisation towards their growth and their responsibilities towards the society. This also acts as a value enhancer in the minds of the people about the company. The vision and mission statement of WMH states about the ways in which they are able to respond to the changing needs of the community. It also describes about the commitment of the company to provide best medical assistance to the patients (The Sydney morning herald, 2014). It creates faith in the minds of the people who are associated with them and taking their services. On the other hand the objectives of the organisation helps employees in staying focused regarding what they have to do. Objectives act as a path bearer for the company and restrict people from getting diverted. The most important thing is that it helps in reducing the amount of errors that happens in the business. This happens due to the fact that it provides clarity in the approach of the business which is necessary for the growth in the company (Dutta, 2015). Making of objectives always helps the company in defining the ways in which they will overcome the challenges faced by the company. Mission and Vision of the company has a very close link with the organisational structure (Wong, Cummings Ducharme, 2013). This can be understood by the fact that vision and mission of the company helps in achieving the strategy and same is the case with organisational structure. The structure of the organisation helps in bringing smoothness to the work process which is again necessary for the growth of the firm. On the longer run it is also to be understood that organisational structure helps in streamlining the idea that is associated with the firm. A properly defined structure of the organisation helps in adding value to the work process at each level which is explained by the vision and mission statements. In any organisation its structure is defined according to the mission and vision they have made for themselves as well as the goals they want to achieve from their business. Sometimes it is seen that a new branches are added to the organisational structure so as to achieve wha t their objectives are for the future. Proposed Organisational structure for WMH As it can be seen in the above part of the essay that the traditional bureaucratic structure which WHM follows has many disadvantages associated with it. This structure does not include workers in the major decision making which is a serious drawback in the changing global business scenario. Firms like WHM has to think that its not the just the duty of managers to make decisions regarding the patients care rather it is a responsibility of all the employees to maintain the standards. The role of each and every person within the organisation becomes significant in this regards. In order to make sure that they have smoothness in the work process they need to restructure the organisation. The organisational structure that can be used within the organisation is a flat or hybrid structure. The flat organisational structure always helps the people in coming to the main frame and takes decisions (Baum, 2016). In this organisational structure people are placed at the same level and hence they get participation in the important function within the organisation. The greatest advantage of using flat structure is that it provides equal opportunities to employees in different fields (Greenfield, Nugus, Travaglia Braithwaite, 2011). It also assists in bringing creativity in the work process which is highly beneficial in solving the problems they are facing. More unanimous decisions are made which helps in ringing higher employee satisfaction. On the other hand its limitation includes that it creates confusion about which decisions might be taken by whom. In this structure there is always a chance that conflict can get arisen. Another drawback associated with this structure is that it results in slow decision making process especially in the case when strong decisions are made (Willis, Reynolds Keleher, 2016). It also lowers the control of management on the organisation which can be dangerous for a firm in the longer run. This kind of structure is useful in the health organisations because it empowers lower level staffs that are in the frontline and meets for the first time with the clients. This ensures that people who are responsible for giving the first aid have the rights to take decisions as per their requirement of the situation. This will promote new leaders to grow within the WMH. Conclusion From the essay it can be concluded that the health firm WHM is following the traditional bureaucratic organisation structure. This structure is highly advantageous in eth terms like it gives managers more control over the operations. In any organisation there is a significant role played by the objectives, mission and vision made by them. It acts as a torch bearer for the company in its growth. Organisational structure is generally designed according to the mission, vision and objectives made by them. This organisation being a health firm needs to follow flat organisational structure so that decisions can be made as per the demands of all the stakeholders. It also empowers employees to share their thoughts on important decision making process. This structure also has some disadvantages associated with it like it slows down the speed of strategic decision making process. References Ashkenas, R., Ulrich, D., Jick, T., Kerr, S. (2015). The boundaryless organization: Breaking the chains of organizational structure. John Wiley Sons. Baum, F. (2016). The new public health (No. Ed. 4). Oxford University Press. Chaudoir, S. R., Dugan, A. G., Barr, C. H. (2013). Measuring factors affecting implementation of health innovations: a systematic review of structural, organizational, provider, patient, and innovation level measures. Implementation Science, 8(1), 22. Dahlgaard, J. J., Pettersen, J., Dahlgaard-Park, S. M. (2011). Quality and lean health care: A system for assessing and improving the health of healthcare organisations. Total Quality Management Business Excellence, 22(6), 673-689. Dutta, M. J. (2015). Communicating health: A culture-centered approach. John Wiley Sons. Greenfield, D., Nugus, P., Travaglia, J., Braithwaite, J. (2011). Factors that shape the development of interprofessional improvement initiatives in health organisations. BMJ quality safety, 20(4), 332-337. Harper, C. (2015). Organizations: Structures, processes and outcomes. Routledge. Kohl 3rd, H. W., Craig, C. L., Lambert, E. V., Inoue, S., Alkandari, J. R., Leetongin, G., ... Lancet Physical Activity Series Working Group. (2012). The pandemic of physical inactivity: global action for public health. The Lancet, 380(9838), 294-305. Luxford, K., Safran, D. G., Delbanco, T. (2011). Promoting patient-centered care: a qualitative study of facilitators and barriers in healthcare organizations with a reputation for improving the patient experience. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 23(5), 510-515. The Sydney morning herald. (2014) Retrieved from: https://www.smh.com.au/national/nsw/call-for-westmead-hospital-name-change-to-whitlam-memorial-hospital-20141104-11guh7.html Willis, E., Reynolds, L., Keleher, H. (Eds.). (2016). Understanding the Australian health care system. Elsevier Health Sciences. Wong, C. A., Cummings, G. G., Ducharme, L. (2013). The relationship between nursing leadership and patient outcomes: a systematic review update. Journal of nursing management, 21(5), 709-724.